DISCUSSIONS ABOUT TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY: ANALYZING CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENCES AND JUSTIFICATION STRATEGIES
نویسندگان
چکیده
The paper is devoted to the study of conceptual differences in interpretation concept – «technological sovereignty». In recent years, many states have proclaimed achievement technological sovereignty as a strategic priority and one goals long-term development. At same time, scientific literature on this topic, presence review publications case studies, there lack analysis differences. documents, state concepts public discourse, articulation «sovereignty» sphere varies from variant close autarky meaning policy maintaining competitive environment diversifying foreign suppliers critical technologies. As methodological basis for study, we chose problematics developed within framework French tradition historical epistemology (J. Martin, L. Althusser, D. Lecourt). Its toolkit makes it possible explicate internal structure interconnection individual interpretations logic justification strategies policy. On example European Union, new an agency was demonstrated, addition, its connection with postulates German ordoliberalism investigated. cases Brazil India represent two different models justifying context understanding center-periphery relations global economy postcolonialism.
منابع مشابه
Detecting sociostructural beliefs about group status differences in online discussions
Detection of fine-grained opinions and beliefs holds promise for improved social media analysis for social science research, business intelligence, and government decision-makers. While commercial applications focus on mapping landscapes of opinions towards brands and products, our goal is to map “sociostructural” landscapes of perceptions of social groups. In this work, we focus on the detecti...
متن کاملDelegating divisible sovereignty: Sweeping a conceptual minefield
Delegating sovereignty to international organizations (IOs) is both increasingly common and controversial. I address the sources of current controversies in three claims. First, although alleged otherwise, sovereignty is eminently divisible. From practice, indivisibility should not be a barrier to delegating to IOs. Second, it is intuitive that longer chains of delegation will be more likely to...
متن کاملAnalyzing Online Behaviors, Roles, and Learning Communities via Online Discussions
Online learning communities are an important means of sharing and creating knowledge. Online behaviors and online roles can reveal how online learning communities function. However, no study has elucidated the relationships among online behaviors, online roles, and online learning communities. In this study, 32 preservice teachers participated in an 18-week instruction program. Analyses of onli...
متن کاملAnalyzing and characterizing political discussions in WhatsApp public groups
We present a thorough characterization of what we believe to be the first significant analysis of the behavior of groups in WhatsApp in the scientific literature. Our characterization of over 270,000 messages and about 7,000 users spanning a 28-day period is done at three different layers. The message layer focuses on individual messages, each of which is the result of specific posts performed ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ???????????? ??????????
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2664-8172', '1819-8058']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2023.102